Date Created
8-2026
Document Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Master of Arts
Department
College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Sociology, Sociology Student Work
First Advisor
Kyle Anne Nelson
First Committee Member
Mel Moore
Abstract
Medicaid expansion is a contentious issue in U. S. political debates, especially regarding its impact on public health outcomes. The Republican Party often shows hesitation to support government funding initiatives, citing concerns about creating dependency on entitlement programs like Medicaid. As a result, state legislatures have significant authority to shape their Medicaid programs, including setting eligibility requirements and defining the scope of benefits and services. In this study, I examine disparities in mental health indicators between economically disadvantaged states that expanded Medicaid and those that did not expand Medicaid. The dependent variables include medical costs, measured by how often individuals encounter financial barriers to accessing medical care, and poor mental health, measured by the number of days a person reports experiencing poor mental health in a month. Data for this research are obtained from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, covering 2014 and 2022, with sample sizes of 456,702 and 436,065 individuals, respectively. According to data collected through 2022, I find that in states that expanded Medicaid, there is a small advantage for respondents in terms of reduced medical costs compared to the residents in non-expansion states. Linear regression analysis demonstrates a positive association in two models when comparing expansion states to non-expansion states. This study offers valuable insights into Medicaid policy and mental health discussions, highlighting that fewer individuals in Medicaid expansion states encounter cost barriers when accessing mental health services. However, the findings regarding whether individuals in expansion states experience fewer days of poor mental health per month compared to those in non-expansion states were mixed. Future research should measure more direct mental health outcomes, such as diagnosis and treatment; future studies should also concentrate on factors such as race, gender, and educational status to better address health care barriers for low-income Americans.
Abstract Format
html
Keywords
Medicaid; Medicaid Expansion; Mental Health
Subject Categories
Medicine and Health | Social and Behavioral Sciences | Sociology
Language
English
Extent
72 pages
Rights Statement
Copyright is held by the author.
Digital Origin
Born digital
Recommended Citation
Yates, Steven Kyle, "State Medicaid Expansion and Mental Health in the Poorest States: Examining Differences in States That Expanded Medicaid Compared to Those Which Did Not" (2026). Master's Theses. 378.
https://digscholarship.unco.edu/theses/378