Date Created
12-2019
Document Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Bachelor of Arts
Department
College of Education and Behavioral Sciences, Psychological Sciences, SPS Student Work, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Criminology and Criminal Justice, CRJ Student Work
First Advisor
Dr. William Douglas Woody
Abstract
Both coercive yet currently acceptable police interrogation tactics and the presence of mental illness in a defendant have been separately identified as risk factors for false confessions by defendants. Extensive research has been completed regarding each issue individually, with researchers struggling to induce sensitivity in jurors to police interrogation tactics and defendants with mental illness separately. In this study, the researchers sought to examine juror’s ability to understand the totality of the circumstances (mild or severe mental health issues as well as mild or severe police interrogation pressures) when clinical expert testimony was or was not present. Undergraduate psychology students were asked to read through a narrative trial transcript and answer questions regarding the trial and their decisions and perceptions of the case. The researchers predicted that the results would show jurors as sensitive to the situational characteristics of each scenario.
Rights Statement
Copyright is held by the author.
Recommended Citation
Derby, Kathryn, "People With Mental Illnesses Who Face Coercive Interrogation: The Capability of Jurors to Consider the Totality of the Circumstances" (2019). Undergraduate Honors Theses. 26.
https://digscholarship.unco.edu/honors/26